The bar chart shows shares of expenditures- food, transportation, housing, health care and clothing, in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in 2009.
The bar chart elucidates the share of expenditure on five different consumer goods (food, housing, transportation, health care and clothing), which surveyed by four countries namely; US, UK, Canada and Japan in 2009. The units show as a percentage.
Overall, the most significant expenditure per categories shows that, US, Canada and Japan for housing, transport and food respectively. The health care and clothing, on the other hand, were the lowest of expenditures in 2009.
In detail, US paid up the most on housing as about 2% more on houses than UK (of around 23%). Whereas, Japan consumed the most on food of around 20% while US and UK paid 12% and 20% respectively. Canada consumed twice of money on transportation compared to Japan of 10%.
All countries had the least payment on health care and clothes. USA have used up the most on health care compared to those of UK. Canada and UK consumed more on clothing of around 7% and 6% respectively than health care. As the graph evidenced, the similar amount has spent on health care and clothing for Japan.
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the year 2009. 70
- The diagram below illustrates the carbon cycle in nature 81
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Public Library from 2011 to 2014. 60
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010. 70
- The table below shows the monthly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001 73
the share of expenditure
the shares of expenditures
consumer goods, which surveyed by four countries namely;
consumer goods, which are surveyed by four countries namely;
consumer goods surveyed by four countries namely;
the most significant expenditure per categories shows that, US, Canada and Japan for housing, transport and food respectively.
Description: can you re-write this sentence?
As the graph evidenced,
As the graph is evidenced,
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.5 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 10
No. of Words: 182 200
No. of Characters: 838 1000
No. of Different Words: 91 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.673 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.604 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.723 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 54 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 36 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 28 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 17 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.545 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.5 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.182 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.426 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.644 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.151 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4