The bar chart shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity of 2014.
The comparative bar chart describes the production and consumption of electricity in top ten countries with in the span of one year.
Firstly, it can be seen that china had the highest ratio as 5398 in production and 5322 in consumption.However, US was on the second peaked city.where, it used 4099 in production and consumption was around 3866. From the russia the production and consumption of electricity was too slumped and figures were around 1057 and 1038 respectively.However, following countries such as japan, India, Canada, France and Brazil had too low compared to US and China.The figures were around in 1000 in both fectors.Moreover, Germany was exceptional case which used 526.6 in production but it consumed 582.5 which was double used.korea was the last country that made 485.1 production and 449.5 consumption respectively.
Overall, China and US were the most leading countries compared to others in both factor. While, Korea,Rep was the last in the chart.However, Germany consumed more power than it’s production
- The charts below shows the number of girls per 100 boys in all levels of education. 73
- The bar chart shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity of 2014. 78
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the government of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 73
- The diagram shows the environmental issues raised by a product over its life cycle. 67
- Too much emphasis is being placed on going university for academic education. People should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a shortage of qualified tradespeople.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...8 in production and 5322 in consumption.However, US was on the second peaked city.where...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
... were around 1057 and 1038 respectively.However, following countries such as japan, Ind...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...il had too low compared to US and China.The figures were around in 1000 in both fec...
^^^
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...res were around in 1000 in both fectors.Moreover, Germany was exceptional case which use...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Rep
...d to others in both factor. While, Korea,Rep was the last in the chart.However, Germ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...le, Korea,Rep was the last in the chart.However, Germany consumed more power than it&ap...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, moreover, second, while, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39877300613 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42945334021 2.65546596893 129% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570552147239 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 150.04665941 43.030603864 349% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 176.0 112.824112599 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.6 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8 5.23603664747 264% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264984873196 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170956360279 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158133807192 0.0843802449381 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244375508625 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.168609991126 0.0819641961636 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.3 13.2329268293 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 61.2550243902 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.