The charts below shows the number of girls per 100 boys in all levels of education.
The given bar chart illustrates the numbers of female enrollment in the education system per 100 male students in developing and developed countries between 1990 to 2000.
By examine the bar chart depicted that primary, secondary, and tertiary educations in which girls are chosen education over the boys. In the primary section, developed countries girls were got admission around 3 girls increased in the year 2000 than in 1900, it was 93 per 100 boys, over developing countries were also saw the same tread but it started from 83 to 87 in 2000. In the secondary and tertiary section, developing countries progressed can be the same in the ten years almost 10 girls are rose in 2000, instead of developing countries bar shows a nearly equal number of girls over 100 boys in both year in secondary school, but in tertiary school girls enrollment more than boys around 105 in 1990 and 112 in 2000. The target of 2005 was shown in all sections of education 100 girls over 100 boys.
In conclusion, the bar graph represents that girls are more chosen for higher secondary courses in developed countries.
- Some people think that in order to prevent illness and disease, governments should try to reduce environmental pollutions and housing problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of country more important than the international music that is hard everywhere nowadays 78
- The table shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 56
- The charts below shows the number of girls per 100 boys in all levels of education. 73
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the government of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'sawed', 'sawn', 'seen'.
Suggestion: sawed; sawn; seen
...ys, over developing countries were also saw the same tread but it started from 83 t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, second, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93717277487 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66045872433 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528795811518 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.3079344246 43.030603864 212% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 157.166666667 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8333333333 22.9334400587 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234011443079 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125234078947 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552816191526 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14110443837 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07427690646 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.