The bar charts illustrate educational and scientific information about developing and industrialized countries. It is obvious that, there are tremendous differences among these countries.
The first chart shows that, years of schooling in developing countries had been really comparable with years of schooling in industrialized countries in 1980 and 1990. Furthermore, in terms of school years, developing countries have really lower position than industrialized countries and also there is a marginal increase in years of schooling in 1990 in contrast with 1980 in both kind of countries.
The second chart has statistic information about scientists and technicians per 1000 people in both kind of countries. As figure shows underdeveloped countries in contrast with developed counties have few expertise people. But, if we compare underdeveloped countries people with themselves in 1980 and 1990 and also compare developed countries with themselves in these two years, there is a marginal increase too.
At the end, spending money for research and development in industrialized countries have been increased in 1990. In contrast with developed countries, the amount of money spending has been decreased in under-developing countries after 10 years. However, there is still a huge difference in spending money between these two kinds of countries and in these 3 charts, developed countries always have been in the first position in contrast with the developing countries.
- Many governments think that economic progress is most important goal some people however think that other types of progress and equally important for a country 84
- The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 11
- The high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising but not the real need of the society where such products are sold To what extend do you agree or disagree 67
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 73
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admissions to museums outweigh the disadvantages 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 1980 and 1990. Furthermore, in terms of school years, developing countries have ...
^^
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'lowed', 'lowered'.
Suggestion: lowed; lowered
...years, developing countries have really lower position than industrialized countries ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... 1000 people in both kind of countries. As figure shows underdeveloped countries i...
^^
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d countries with themselves in these two years, there is a marginal increase too....
^^
Line 5, column 416, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ears, there is a marginal increase too. At the end, spending money for research ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...untries have been increased in 1990. In contrast with developed countries, the amount of...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 468, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...contrast with the developing countries.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, really, second, so, still, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1262.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71040723982 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2273325448 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452488687783 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 357.3 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1019569097 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.2 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1 5.23603664747 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257499084055 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124571006373 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655113396818 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171045638016 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293110564012 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.4140731707 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.