the bar charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing coutries and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990

The data shows the differences between developing and industrialized countries’ participation in education and science.

in terms of the number of years of schooling received, we see that the length of time people spend at school in industrialized countries was much greater at 8.5 years in 1980, compared to 2.5 years in developing countries. the gap was increased for further in 1990 when the figures rose to 10.5 years and 3.5 years respectively.

we can see a similar pattern in the second graph, which shows that the number of people working as scientists and technicians in industrialized countries increased from 55 to 85 per 1000 people between 1980 and 1990, while the number in developing countries went from 12 to 20.

finally the figures for spending on research and development showed that industrialized countries more than doubled their spending from 2 dollars to $14, whereas developing countries actually decreased theirs, from $7 down to $2,000.

overall we can see that not only are there very large differences between the two economies but that these gaps are widening.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ticipation in education and science. in terms of the number of years of schooli...
^^
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...d to 2.5 years in developing countries. the gap was increased for further in 1990 w...
^^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er in 1990 when the figures rose to 10.5 years and 3.5 years respectively. we ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...5 years and 3.5 years respectively. we can see a similar pattern in the second...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
...loping countries went from 12 to 20. finally the figures for spending on research an...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: finally,
...loping countries went from 12 to 20. finally the figures for spending on research an...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ountries actually decreased theirs, from down to ,000. overall we can see that...
^^
Line 7, column 222, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...actually decreased theirs, from down to ,000. overall we can see that not only...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...ecreased theirs, from down to ,000. overall we can see that not only are there very...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, if, second, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26704545455 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07318090217 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585227272727 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.5740315882 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.5 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3333333333 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201064812642 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107399338362 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083342994436 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121647035993 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0843645722309 0.0819641961636 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.2329268293 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.88 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.