bar graph
The two bar graphs illustrate the information about computer ownership in 2002 and 2010. However, one graph depicts the detail about computer ownership according to years whereas, another bar graph shows some information but it categorized by education level.
Firstly, from the first bar graph, it can be seen that the percentage was constantly increasing as per year. In 2002, the percentage ownership was nearly 50% and with gradually inclination the percentage went to nearly 80% in 2010.
Secondly, from the second graph, in 2002, nearly 10% students owned computer who did not completed high school diploma while, the percentage had been increased to 40% in 2010. Furthermore, nearly 40% high school graduates bought computer and approximately 70% in 2010. Additionally, the percentage was approximately same for college students who did not completed study and bachelor’s degree holders in both years. The percentage was in the range of 50% to 90%. In contrast, this trend was more popular among post graduate qualified students, nearly 80% for 2002 and 100% for 2010.
Overall, the trend for computers had been increased from the first graph, whilst, the percentage according to education level was also rose up.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 136, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'risen'.
Suggestion: risen
...e according to education level was also rose up.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31958762887 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80264515295 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551546391753 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6908476954 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.2 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 5.23603664747 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232043720631 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113847625211 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139259370519 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17448589815 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137839544181 0.0819641961636 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.