The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999, and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999
The line graph displays the number of tourists in the UK between 1979 to 1999 while the bar graph illustrates the most eminent states visited by UK individuals in 1999.
We can see from the line graph that the number of visitors abroad by the UK population outnumbered the proportion of tourists to the UK by foreigners. It's obvious from the bar chart that French individuals were the most tourists visiting the UK at the start of the period whereas, Turkey residents were the lowest.
The line graph represents two categories from 1979 to 1999 with tourists abroad from UK occupants which starts from nearly 12 million at the start of the period and boost sharply to reach approximately 52 million by the end of the time frame however, the second category which is the foreigners who visit the UK Which starts from 10 million at the beginning of the period and increased steadily to be approximately 28 million by 1999.
The bar chart shows a comparison between the most well-known nations visited by UK inhabitants in 1999, we can perceive that France and Spain were the most countries visited by UK citizens with around 12 million and million respectively whereas, Greece and Turkey were the lowest with 4 million and 3 million respectively
- The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore
- Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 56
- Some people think it would be better for large companies and industry to move to regional areas outside large urban centers do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The graphs below show unemployment rates and average earnings according to level of education Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, second, so, well, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83644859813 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69332839033 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453271028037 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 22.4926829268 187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 112.383984624 43.030603864 261% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 207.0 112.824112599 183% => OK
Words per sentence: 42.8 22.9334400587 187% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.488441396914 0.215688989381 226% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.285192278772 0.103423049105 276% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948905573925 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.322260979097 0.15604864568 207% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919031929905 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.8 13.2329268293 172% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.77 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.3012195122 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.68 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.8 10.9970731707 171% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.