The Bar graph bellow shows the Expenditure in pence per week on fast food items by income groups in the UK. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.
The chart illustrates the budget on three different kinds of fast foods by three income groups at UK in 1990.
Overall, it is evident that there were differences between the money spent on fast foods among three groups and the low income group tended to spend the smallest expenditure on fast foods.
In term of hamburger, high income group spent the largest money on it, at 43 pence per week, followed by average income group which spent 33 pence per week on hamburger. The lowest expenditure on hamburger was belonged to low income group whose spending was only 17 pence per week. There was a similar trend of expenditure on pizza. The spending of high income group was 19 pence per week, higher than that of average income group and low income group which spent only 13 and 18 pence per week on pizza, respectively.
The budget on fish and chips saw a slight difference. Average income group spent exactly 25 pence per week on fish and chips, which was the highest budget. The spending of high income group on fish and chips was a bit lower, at 18 pence per week. The low income group was still the group having the lowest budget on it, at only 8 pence per week
- Nowadays more and more young people hold the important positions in the government. Some people think that is a good thing while others argue that it is not suitable . Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- These days many of us prefer to throw damaged things away whereas in the past people used to repair damaged items and keep them for a long time Explain why you think this change has happened What are the effects of this change in attitude 92
- The graph below shows the changes in UK birth rate in 6 different age groups from 1973 to 2008 73
- More and more people think there is no need for printed newspapers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. Summarise the information by seclecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...up and low income group which spent only 13 and 18 pence per week on pizza, respe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50943396226 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21798451802 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.419811320755 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3393071348 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.9 5.23603664747 17% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302399437532 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155107848802 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070611194003 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202429319091 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427179582992 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.76 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.