The bar graph below shows the amount of carbon emissions in different countries during three different years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The Bar Chart illustrates the quantity of carbon release in various nations in years 1975, 1990, and 2005.

Overall, it is found that in USA, China, India and Canada carbon emissions are increased from 1975 to 2005. On the other hand, emission quantity is reduced in Germany and UK.

In USA, Carbon fumes emitted are highest than all other countries. It is 1,20,000 metric tones in 1975. Which raised 10000 units by 1990 which again raised three times by 2005 reaching about 1,60,000 units. In the same way, the quantity of fluorocarbon release in India ,China and Canada follows the same pattern. In China the emissions almost skyrocketed after 1990 by more than twice. Compared to China the carbon gases released are very less in India which is further less in Canada.

In Contrast to these countries, Germany maintained constant emissions from 1975 to 1990. However, it further went almost 10% down by 2005. In UK, the gases evolved in 1975 decreased till 1990 and it remained unchanged till 2005.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tions in years 1975, 1990, and 2005. Overall, it is found that in USA, China,...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...antity is reduced in Germany and UK. In USA, Carbon fumes emitted are highest...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0,000 metric tones in 1975. Which raised 10000 units by 1990 which again raised ...
^^
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es in 1975. Which raised 10000 units by 1990 which again raised three times by ...
^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 10000 units by 1990 which again raised three times by 2005 reaching about 1,60,...
^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...uantity of fluorocarbon release in India ,China and Canada follows the same patter...
^^
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n China the emissions almost skyrocketed after 1990 by more than twice. Compared ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dia which is further less in Canada. In Contrast to these countries, Germany ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m 1975 to 1990. However, it further went almost 10% down by 2005. In UK, the gas...
^^
Line 7, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urther went almost 10% down by 2005. In UK, the gases evolved in 1975 decreased ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, in contrast, in contrast to, in the same way, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94117647059 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30747244095 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570588235294 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.1348702659 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.0 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1666666667 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0727962018111 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0294323886145 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0278116501769 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0573699787288 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297974186256 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.78 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.