The bar graph below shows the number of tourists visiting two different cities by season.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The bar graph below shows the number of tourists visiting two different cities by season.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph gives data about how many people visiting the city of Dover and Troy in each of the four seasons of 2014. These data sources clearly communicate that the number of visitors changed through the reasons. In addition to that, the winter in the city of Dover witnessed the biggest number of visitors, while most people came to the city of Troy to visit in the summer.

As we can see from the graph, the seasons from the spring to the winter witnessed an increase in the number of tourists to the city of Dover. Among all the seasons, the winter was the time when most people traveled there, with 25000 visitors, while only one fifth of that number visited the city of Dover in the spring. Another clear feature is that there was a biggest increase from the fall to the winter, when the number of visitors rose from 15000 to 25000.

On the contrary, the busiest tourism season in the city of Troy was the summer, with about 22000 tourists came to visit. The number in the fall seemed similar to that in the summer, which had just about 2000 tourists more. Furthermore, the least busy season was the spring, with only nearly 5000 visitors, while the winter was almost equally quiet, with exactly 5000 tourists.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2017-07-14 meobeoulala 67 view
Essays by user meobeoulala :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e city of Troy to visit in the summer. As we can see from the graph, the season...
^^^
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...Another clear feature is that there was a biggest increase from the fall to the w...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, while, in addition, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59360730594 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.07002976985 2.65546596893 78% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474885844749 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.2542177681 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.777777778 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166007910372 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836857325397 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464826499207 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122880872693 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190995244718 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.