The bar graph below shows the number of tourists visiting two different cities by season.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The shown bar graph depicts the quantities of travelers who spent time in each of two cities, Dover and Troy over four specific seasons of the year 2014. Overall, Dover attracted visitors better throughout the year, while Troy was busier with tourists in summer and fall, and quite quiet in other ones.
In Dover, the number of visitors had a significant increase in each of all seasons. At the beginning of the year 2014, in spring, only 5000 tourists traveled to the city which was the lowest number. However, the number of visitors abruptly surged which rocketed doubly and triply at 10,000 and 15,000 people respectively in summer and fall, in comparison with the number in spring. Thereafter, the growth still continued that the winter was the busiest tourist season for Dover, welcoming 25,000 travelers.
In marked contrast, Troy did not have the steady climb throughout the year as Dover. Troy was busiest in welcoming the visitors in summer which dominated first place with over 21,000 visitors. After that, the number in fall came in turn with 20,000 tourists. Spring and winter were two unfavorable seasons for Troy that the number in those drop to the lowest number at around 5,000 visitors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-02 | Fazilat Musurmonqulova | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-18 | Raspreet | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-17 | Raspreet | 67 | view |
| 2021-06-18 | Nguyen Nguyen | 93 | view |
| 2021-06-18 | Nguyen Nguyen | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The bar graph below shows the number of tourists visiting two different cities by season Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The line graph below shows the number of single family homes constructed in the United States by region over a period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting in the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 73
- The table below shows the average monthly rainfall in two different cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 91
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0099009901 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35206350365 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564356435644 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.301020393 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.2 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126337615756 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551984429874 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400508195793 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924038178348 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199325982702 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.