The information about number of visitor visiting to two different cities Dover and Troy in spring, summer, fall and winter season is illustrated by the given bar graph.
Thus for an overall, it is crystal clear that in summer and fall season in city Troy was registered the maximum number of tourist as compare to Dover, while in spring and winter season Troy was record minimum number of visitors.
At the fist glance, it can be clearly seen from chart that the number of tourists in Dover city was registered the highest in winter season, that accounted about 25,000. It was followed by fall season, having 15,000 visitors. 10,000 tourists were recorded in case of summer season. However, in spring season number of tourists were lowest which was about 5,000.
Moving further, in Troy city, tourists were accounted also same in spring and winter season as tourist in Dover city in spring season. In summer season, number visitor were more than twice Troy city as compare to Dover, while in fall season difference between tourist of two cities were just 5,000 visitors that were more in Troy.
- Adults always say that life is better in childhood and classroom than now Why they think so Do you agree or disagree 84
- Writing task 1 The Car Ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 78
- The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five year period 84
- The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five year period 78
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...is illustrated by the given bar graph. Thus for an overall, it is crystal clear tha...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, thus, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86631016043 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.1985179288 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470588235294 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6744223726 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.75 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230250114465 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131186767612 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069313506776 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18236942282 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672763179604 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.