The bar graph shows the expenditure on four reading books (hobbies, entertainment, history and art) over a decade.
Overall, it is clearly evident that, history books were widely sold, whereas a lesser sales were made on hobbies books over the period
Moving to a more detailed analysis, in the early year (2002), there were a lot of patronage in history books with a little over 4000 pieces sold. The other categories of books (hobbies, art and entertainment), however, accounted for less than 2000 copies to be sold with varied figures. Reaching a peak of 10000 samples of history books to be sold after 6 years, the figure had slightly declined to 9000 copies sold by the year end.
Both entertainment and art books saw a similar increasing trend. More precisely, by 2 consecutive years; the figure had remained at 3000 and 4000 in 2006 and 2008 respectively. By 2012, a lot more of art books were purchased than entertainment and hobbies books. Sales made on hobbies remained stable over the period.
- The line graph below in the amount of coffee exported from three countries between 2002 and 2012 64
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The pie charts and table give information about the total value sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000. 78
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four European countries between 1990 and 1999. 78
- Modern technology allows machines to perform the hard work instead of humans Does this have a positive or a negative effect on people Give your own opinion and examples 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88888888889 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69218070368 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573099415205 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7265876544 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0742541459407 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0381683947419 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0265854974437 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0534715626006 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274612962151 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.