The bar graph shows the expenditure on four reading books (hobbies, entertainment, history and art) over a decade.
Overall, it is clearly evident that, history books were widely sold, whereas a lesser sales were made on hobbies books over the period
Moving to a more detailed analysis, in the early year (2002), there were a lot of patronage in history books with a little over 4000 pieces sold. The other categories of books (hobbies, art and entertainment), however, accounted for less than 2000 copies to be sold with varied figures. Reaching a peak of 10000 samples of history books to be sold after 6 years, the figure had slightly declined to 9000 copies sold by the year end.
Both entertainment and art books saw a similar increasing trend. More precisely, by 2 consecutive years; the figure had remained at 3000 and 4000 in 2006 and 2008 respectively. By 2012, a lot more of art books were purchased than entertainment and hobbies books. Sales made on hobbies remained stable over the period.
- The tables below give information about the world population and distribution in 1950 and 2000, with an estimate of the situation in 2050 78
- Modern technology allows machines to perform the hard work instead of humans Does this have a positive or a negative effect on people Give your own opinion and examples 81
- The money spent on space research has brought enormous benefits to mankind. But it could be more usefully applied. How far do you agree? 67
- The diagram below shows the steps in the process of manufacturing yogurt 84
- The pie charts and table give information about the total value sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88888888889 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69218070368 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573099415205 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7265876544 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0742541459407 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0381683947419 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0265854974437 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0534715626006 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274612962151 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.