The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006.

The bar graph compares the worldwide expenditure on four game kinds (mobile phone, online, console, handheld) form 2000 to 2006

Overall, it is clearly evident that, handheld games were by far the most purchased game globally, with sales on mobile phone games steadily rising over the period.

Moving to a more detailed analysis, in 2000 nearly 12 billion dollars were accrued from selling handheld games, with around a half of that figure representing sales made on console games. Interestingly, there seem to be lack of interest shown in mobile phone and online games, however, in 2001, a negligible purchases on online games were noted. After one year (2002), a mere 2 billion dollars were made from both online and mobile phone games with as much as 15 billion dollars and 5 billion dollars made on handheld and console games respectively.

By the year end, handheld games, mobile phone games and online games experienced a similar increasing trend. Sales made globally on online games and mobile phone games were 9 billion dollars and 7 billion dollars respectively, with sales in handheld games peaking at 18 billion dollars. The purchases on console on the other hand, remained fairly stable over the period.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'purchase'?
Suggestion: purchase
...e games, however, in 2001, a negligible purchases on online games were noted. After one y...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.105 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49859460497 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.9431230135 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.857142857 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5714285714 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275742333046 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136790819655 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105348812218 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187611338494 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457634697559 0.0819641961636 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.