It is true that humans have greatly benefited from funds used on space research, even though other important alternatives ought to have been taken into consideration. I completely agree that, monies could have been strictly utilized on public services aside the space sciences.
There are various reasons why investing in the work of astronauts need to be reconsidered. Firstly, pace launching is extremely expensive. This involves the high costs associated with training scientists and other workers as well as the acquisition of necessary equipment. It can be argued that, humans are able to study the galaxy through the space missions. However, this is only applicable to people who reside in more industralised regions. On the other hand, the less privileged are most often not beneficiaries to these discoveries, which I believe is not worth the budget on such programs.
I believe that funding space missions should be directed towards public services instead. It is much cheaper to build schools, hospitals than it is to spend on space launch. The public services come at a greater opportunity for all inhabitants in a particular area. To cite an example, students can find themselves in well-built schools to further their education. Additionally, people who fall sick can seek health care from the health care delivery to improve their health. If funds are shifted to these services, the vast majority will have a better quality of life.
In conclusion, I consider that money needs to be allocated to services in the society that benefit all individuals as it is misplaced to have attention on importance of space projects.
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon. 78
- With the rise of ebooks comes the decline in paper books. Some people see this as a good forward step while others do not. What are advantages and disadvantages of this trend? 61
- The money spent on space research has brought enormous benefits to mankind. But it could be more usefully applied. How far do you agree? 67
- The diagram shows the stages of processing cocoa beans 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, so, well, in conclusion, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2196969697 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88936454197 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632575757576 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.952666406 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8666666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144246088764 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415867197494 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457759580102 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934957709702 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444139094358 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.