The bar graph shows the number of people employed in different workplaces in one region of Australia in 2001 and 2008. Summarize the data by selecting and reporting key factors and making comparisons where appropriate.
The given vertical bar graph compares the number of individuals employed in sales, computing, accounting, nursing, and farming in one region of Australia in 2001 and 2008.
Overall, it can be seen that the sales sector had the maximum workforce, while the minimum amount of employed was noticed in the farming sector in both years. Moreover, employment figures did not significantly change any other sector in between the two years.
In 2001, approximately 180,000 workers were employed in the sales sector. After that in the next seven years, a slight rose was noticed 10,000 more people employed in sales. The computing and nursing sector employees experienced minimal growth from 100,000 to 120,000 in the computing sector and from 40,000 to 50,000 in the nursing sector.
A glance at the remaining information, the workforce in the accounting and farming sectors declined with time. In 2001, the workforce in the accounting sector just less than one lakh were employed, and only 30,000 people worked in farming fields. In the accounting sector, the figure stood at just over three quarters, and a negligible amount of employment was noticed in the farming sector in 2008.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-25 | Poinsettia03 | 92 | view |
| 2021-04-25 | Poinsettia03 | 38 | view |
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities Do you agree or disagree 84
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales(in various formats) of films from a particular store between 2002 to 2011.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...other sector in between the two years. In 2001, approximately 180,000 workers w...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22513089005 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63998973312 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55497382199 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9578855848 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.888888889 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124122190535 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677506252836 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824773754864 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108082482903 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10404395864 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.