The bar graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph illustrates the information about the terms of percentage of academic staff enrolled in seven various departments by gender in a main university during 2012.
In overall, male constituted a major in engineering faculty and female for education department since women least in engineering and men in education. However, a significant change can be noticed in all the faculties over the period.
It can be seen from the information that department of engineering became more popular among males which accounted at over a four fifths from 2012 as well as females shown less interest for same faculty at around a fifth in major university. On the other hand, women attained a higher figure for education at nearly a three quarters where only 18% men chosen this department in particular year. Interestingly, a disparity of a fifth ( 20% ) can be observed in the proportion of both genders ( men 60% and women 40% ) in law faculty between 2012.
The graph further proves that between 2012, the percentage of males and females for business and science departments was found at three fifths ( men) and below two fifths ( women ) respectively in specific year in main university. Even though, the amount of medicine faculty for males and females remained relatively similar a negligible difference of 1% can be seen at more than a half ( 57% ) from 2012. Lastly, around 60% women enrolled in arts department whilst men noticed at over a two fifth in given year in major university.
- The two pie chart below shows the percentage of industry sectors’s contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- With all the problems in the world today, spending money on space exploration is a completely waste. The money could be better spent on other causes. Discuss. 73
- Some people believe that technology has made men more social and other think that it has made him less social. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 73
- Demand for food is increasing worldwide? What is the cause of this? What measures can the international community take to make sure the supply of food is enough? 78
- The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 433, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r. Interestingly, a disparity of a fifth 20% can be observed in the proportion o...
^^
Line 5, column 438, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...terestingly, a disparity of a fifth 20% can be observed in the proportion of bot...
^^
Line 5, column 489, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...served in the proportion of both genders men 60% and women 40% in law faculty be...
^^
Line 5, column 512, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n of both genders men 60% and women 40% in law faculty between 2012. The graph...
^^
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce departments was found at three fifths men and below two fifths women respect...
^^
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t three fifths men and below two fifths women respectively in specific year in ...
^^
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... fifths men and below two fifths women respectively in specific year in main un...
^^
Line 7, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce of 1% can be seen at more than a half 57% from 2012. Lastly, around 60% women...
^^
Line 7, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 1% can be seen at more than a half 57% from 2012. Lastly, around 60% women enro...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, lastly, well, in particular, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1229.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99593495935 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83244378379 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528455284553 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.5910430883 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.555555556 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200173913851 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949849189141 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756528897244 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154317938701 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732504820468 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.