The bat chart shows the typical weekday for students in four different countries and about world wide.
The given bar graphs illustrates the statistical data regarding number of students of four different nations and global average.
Overall, from the fleeting glance it is vived that number of learners of age 9 are higher in all nations except Japan.
It can be seen that children of age 9 are less than the students of age 13. Furthermore, more proportion of students who are 9 years old are more than the number of those students whom age is 13 years. Number of students in Japan and Hong Kong are above 30 in all age groups. On the other hand, number of students in Russia are same in both age groups, which is just above 10 .
Probing ahead , in United States, students in the age of 9 years are around 25 in each class and children of 13 years old are just under 20. Moreover, in global average children who are in 13 years are less than the proportion of those students who are under 9 years. The proportion of both age groups are almost same in United States and global average.
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Give reasons for you 87
- Some people believe that exams are an inappropriate way of measuring students performance and should be replaced by continuous assessment Do you agree or dis agree with this view 70
- The bar graph above shows average earning in the republic of Ireland in 5 different years with projections for the future 72
- The internet has transform the way information is shared and consumed, but it has also created problem that did not exist before. What are serious problem associated with internet. What are the best way to solve it. 67
- In many cities, many people are living in apartment blocks.Does this accommodation have more advantages and disadvantages. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...urthermore, more proportion of students who are 9 years old are more than the number of...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... both age groups, which is just above 10 . Probing ahead , in United States, st...
^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...hich is just above 10 . Probing ahead , in United States, students in the age o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 809.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.44505494505 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34147061498 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461538461538 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.5324834596 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.8888888889 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.085492215353 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434073522211 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035672169265 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0590840655151 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469614552968 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.62 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.