The below chart illustrates marriage and divorce rates in the UK during the latter part of the twentieth century.
The graph shows marriage, divorce, and remarriage numbers in the United Kingdom between the years 1961 and 1999. There appears to be a somewhat negative relationship between first marriage rates and the rates of divorces and remarriages.
According to the data, there were about 350,000 first marriages in 1961. This value grew in a slightly unstable manner to a peak in 1970 of 400,000 before dropping to 270,000 in 1978. What followed this was a period of very gradual decrease until 250,000 first marriages were hit in 1991. This downward progression accelerated middly until 1999, when first marriage number were roughly 200,000.
Divorce and remarriage numbers, however, moved in the opposite direction. There were roughly 25,000 divouces in the UK in 1961 and over the next decade this number swelled to 125,000. A period of modest, yet unstable, growth then occurred and carried on until 1984, when a plateau of just over 150,000 was reached. Light variation round this value continue until 1999. Remarriages showed similar growth, accelerating from 50,000 in 1961 to 125,000 in 1971. The remaining period was marked by a relatively statble plateau of roughly 120,000 remarriages per year.
- Despite spending several years in Yekaterinburg he could not speak a word of Russian Some cultures value old age while others value young age Discuss both attitudes and express your opinion 73
- More and more people are forgetting the meanings behind occasions such as national festivals What do you think are the causes of this What solutions do you suggest 78
- Some people feel schools should be responsible for providing lunch to primary and secondary students Other think parents should send their children to school with box luches made at home Analyse both positions 61
- If you want to know a person look at their friends How accurate is this statement What personal experiences have you had that support or refute this claim Write a well reasoned essay response with examples 73
- Some people feel schools should be responsible for providing lunch to primary and secondary students Other think parents should send their children to school with box luches made at home Analyse both positions 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, so, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.265625 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56719061718 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609375 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.8420784013 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.25 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.072343875771 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0342860551281 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05129618612 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0657699858779 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424111383117 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, so, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.265625 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56719061718 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609375 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.8420784013 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.25 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.072343875771 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0342860551281 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05129618612 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0657699858779 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424111383117 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.