Bunraby Public Library

Essay topics:

Bunraby Public Library

The graph gives information about quantity of books read by men and women at Burnaby Library over 4 years.
As can be seen from the graph, there were two different trends between men and women. Man`s trend had modest increase from 2500 to 4000 books between 2011 to 2012. But there were extraordinarily high rise from 4000 to 14 000 books between 2012 to 2014.
Women`s trend had another character. Number of books read by women had modest increase from 4500 to 10 000 books between 2011 and 2013. Unfortunately, some accidents were happened in 2013 and woman`s trend became negative and there was a slight fall from 10 000 to 8000 books between 2013 and 2014.
Overall, there were two different trends in reading by the men and women. Men`s trend had upward trend with steady rise. But women`s trend had a rise and a decline in other period of time.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-01-25 KATE_Kate 11 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... women at Burnaby Library over 4 years. As can be seen from the graph, there wer...
^^^
Line 4, column 103, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
... and women. Men's trend had upward trend with steady rise. But women's tren...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 184, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...trend had a rise and a decline in other period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 200, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and a decline in other period of time.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 729.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79605263158 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53786252408 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539473684211 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 198.9 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.7720917855 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.9 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.1 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0163290895663 0.215688989381 8% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00870123495045 0.103423049105 8% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0261037048514 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0217530873761 0.15604864568 14% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376774525569 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.