The changes of people who went for international travel in 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005
The table illustrates how people were changed in going for international travel between 1990 and 2005.
Overall, there was an increase in the total number of people who travelled internationally throughout the period, which was due to the increases in the number of tourists from different continents, except the America. In addition, the number of international travellers to the Europe witnessing the most dramatic rise, surpassing America to become the continent welcoming the most international tourists since 1995 and onward.
448,9 millions of people were travelling to different continents in 1990, following by a significant increase to 693,7 million in 2005. The similar changes can be seen in the figures for Europe, Asia and the Pacific, which started at 280,2 million and 60,2 million respectively, with a subsequent considerable growth to 400,2 million and 135,8 million in 2005.
Furthermore, there were also slightly rises in the number of visitors for the Middle West and Africa. Starting at 9,1 million and 18,2 million, they increased gradually to about 2millions of travellers every 5 years and ending the period at 15,8 million and 28,7 million in 2005. The reversed trend can be seen in the figure for America, beginning at 680,5 millions of travellers in 1990, being the continent which had the highest number of tourists. After which it experienced a sharply drop to just 112,5 million in 1995 before ending the period at 113,2 million in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 73
- The graph shows the number of visitors to four international museums between 1980 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- The bar chart below illustrates five different industries percentage share of Brazil s economy in 2009 and 2019 with a forecast for 2029 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- The graph below shows the percentage of part time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 5, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '9 million'.
Suggestion: 9 million
... tourists since 1995 and onward. 448,9 millions of people were travelling to different con...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 356, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
...he figure for America, beginning at 680,5 millions of travellers in 1990, being the continent...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 479, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('sharply') instead an adjective, or a noun ('drop') instead of another adjective.
...of tourists. After which it experienced a sharply drop to just 112,5 million in 1995 before en...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1243.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26694915254 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8484505684 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542372881356 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8543049664 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.111111111 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2222222222 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274544871846 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137500403547 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106991559027 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217404953288 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117520760156 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.