The char below shows the percentage of whole world population in four countries from 1950 to 2000, with projections till 2050. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The column graph illustrates the statistic of population of world’s four countries named India, China, the USA and Japan between 1950 and 2000, and also indicates predication for 2050.
Overall, it is clearly seen that China had highest percentage of world population in 1950 and 2000. However, estimates show that India will take the lead by 2050. Japan had the least population in the given period, and count of citizen is expected to decrease to approximately 3% by 2050.
It is manifest that China’s population was just over a quarter of the world’s population in 1950. It reduced gradually to slight under quarter but it was still at first position. It is estimated that the population of China will continue to drop and would reach to approximately 19% by 2050. India was second highest in 1950 and 2000 with 15% and around 18% population of the world respectively. It is predicted that India will cross 20% in 2050. When it comes to the population of the USA and Japan, both showed decline from 1950 to 2000. It is estimated that the percentage will remain same in the USA, whereas in Japan, the population will keep falling till 2050.
- The charts below show the percentage of time working adults spent on different activities in a particular country in 1958 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 86
- The graph shows the spending on education medical care and pension in a particular country from 2001 to 2051 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- An increase in production of consumer goods results in damage of the natural environment What are the causes and possible solutions 92
- To learn a foreign language successfully you need to spend time in the country where the language is spoken. To what extent do you agree with this? 84
- The gap between the rich and the poor is becoming wider, the rich more richer, the poor even more poorer. What problems can the situation cause and give the solutions? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 41, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the highest'.
Suggestion: had the highest
... Overall, it is clearly seen that China had highest percentage of world population in 1950 ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ter but it was still at first position. It is estimated that the population of Chi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, still, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 967.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88383838384 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75133418767 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2251318998 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.9090909091 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251791875563 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105376308183 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588227579485 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185545733602 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171453722013 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.