The chart and graph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
These following graphs demonstrate both genders and amount of competitors who already have participated in the Games since their commencement. The bar graph characterizes the number of male and female possessing to remain competitive in the Games, whereas a trend line represents the amount of respondents.
The bar chart unambiguously highlights that, up till 2012, male athletes outnumbered female members in the Games. Females were infrequently underrepresented in the Games during 1924 to 1952, regardless of the fact that out 4,000 males served as a delegate in 1952. Notwithstanding, the proportion of females competitors increased substantially in 2012, representing or thereabouts 5,000, although about 1,000 less than the comparison to male registrants.
The line graph exemplifies a roughly comparable phenomenon, with the increment of individuals continuing to increase over through the hundred years. The tremendous improvement materialized respectively 1984 as well as 2012, whenever the percentage of sportsmen accelerated from just upwards of 6,000 in 1984, acrossing over 10,000 in 2012.
To contextualise, the total count of olympians struggling to compete in the Olympic Games has risen exponential growth since 1924. This seems to be especially important for people, who now disproportionately affects heterosexual men in almost each category.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-12 | dhananjaydeej | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-12 | dhananjaydeej | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | quykute291203 | 95 | view |
| 2021-08-25 | Amna Zeeshan | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-21 | rajpatel90 | view |
- In many countries around the world life expectancy is increasing Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this situation and give your own opinion 95
- Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child s development while others think that it is important for children to go to school Discuss the advantages of both methods and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and inc 95
- The chart and graph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1169.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8743718593 4.92477711251 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.51130810582 2.65546596893 132% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.693467336683 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.1724913544 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 129.888888889 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.09620643242 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398426445106 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413279012454 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0565169836977 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361777842242 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.4140731707 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.06136585366 126% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 40.7170731707 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.