Both graphics show information about the population in China among 1950, the present and the possible future trends. The bar chart illustrates the changens in the number of habitants, on the other hand, the table informs the total population aged 65 years or over and the participation percentage of them in the total. At a glance, the population in Japan is going to decrease in the future, and the porcentaje of Aged 65 years people will be more representative.
In refference to the information from the bar chart. The population in china were 84.1 millons ins 1950, then increased constantly to 127.8 millons util 2005. After that year, and in concordance with future trends, the popullation will plump until 89.9 millons in 2055
About the information from the table. While, In 1950 the population aged 65 years or over were 4.1 millons representing 4.9% of the total, in 2055 it expects that this number will increase to 36.5 and will represent the 41% of the total.
To conclude, according to the future trends, the population is china is not just only becoming shorter, but also older. This situation could create some economic problems due to the lack of quantity of actively economic population.
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The pie charts below show the percentage of housing owned and rented in the UK in 1991 and 2007 Summarize the information by describing the main features of the charts and making comparisons where appropriate Write at least 150 words
- In many countries today insufficient respect is shown to older people What do you think may be the reasons for this What problems might this cause in society 43
- Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land What solution is better 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... number of habitants, on the other hand, the table informs the total population a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98522167488 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74883909721 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5232634434 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.444444444 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16298930512 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793073611914 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603641678674 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969640663217 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569905986183 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.