Throught the years the way of dressing at work have changed, in the the past decade the idea of people wearing informall clothes in their jobs was impossible. However, nowadays much organizations have decided to allow their employees to wear more confortable during their time at work. On the one hand, in favor to this new trend, companies argue that the employees are happier and more creative when are allowed to use any kind of clothes. On the other hand, against wearing informal, some organizations argues that the clothes are important as a first glance and help the employees with their conffidence during meetings. In my opinion, according the business, both ways of dressing could be posssible.
To Start takle this two point of views, there are two main arguments in favor to the informal clothes. Firstly, is a fact that happier employees are efficien,t and today, so many people are looking for companies without a dress code, in other words, if a company allows their empoyees to wear as they want, this would be profitable for it. Secondly the possibility of a flexible and confortable enviroment is better to the creativity, and the clothes could help to achieve that. A proof of this are big tech compaines like google or facebook, that eccourage their employees to dress as they want to become them more creative.
About the second point of view, some organizations prefer obligate their employees to dress smartlhy Employers argues that the clothes help their employees to give a good first glance, and also help them to be more conffidende during important meetings. About the first argument, in some places as layer buffets, the way of dressing is taked as an image brand, so dress smarrtly is very important. In reffernce to the second argument, the conffidence during meetings could helps the workers to expose better, and the clothes plays an protagonist role in it.
To conclude, and for all the aforamentioned arguments, the best way for a company to decide between formal or informal clothes is understanding which kind of image brand want to show and what skills what to develope on their employees.
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1950 and 2002 and projections for 2050 73
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 67
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen and it is positive or negative development 73
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen and it is positive or negative development 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ay of dressing at work have changed, in the the past decade the idea of people wearing ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ay of dressing at work have changed, in the the past decade the idea of people wearing ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... jobs was impossible. However, nowadays much organizations have decided to allow the...
^^^^
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nformal clothes. Firstly, is a fact that happier employees are efficien,t and tod...
^^
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , t
...act that happier employees are efficien,t and today, so many people are looking f...
^^
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...king for companies without a dress code, in other words, if a company allows thei...
^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ligate their employees to dress smartlhy Employers argues that the clothes help t...
^^
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ant meetings. About the first argument, in some places as layer buffets, the way...
^^
Line 5, column 438, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt. In reffernce to the second argument, the conffidence during meetings could he...
^^
Line 5, column 478, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
... the conffidence during meetings could helps the workers to expose better, and the c...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 536, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...to expose better, and the clothes plays an protagonist role in it. To conclude,...
^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...cide between formal or informal clothes is understanding which kind of image brand want to show ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, kind of, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1781.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9748603352 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69155639507 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.76152304609 273% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.2453153635 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.0 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5384615385 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.01903807615 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195718377556 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736988074985 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598516764524 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112450815259 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661180451076 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.