At the moment, there is a large proportion of young adults compared with the amount of the elderly, in certain countries. The above circumstance is available to bring several advantages and outweigh the disadvantages.
To begin with, the amount of labor supply is influenced by the young adults. Because the elderly should be retired by the compulsory laws, young adults is the vital part for the labor supply. For instance, the consequences of lacking young adults can be clearly seen in Japan. Since there are a number of elder people who retired after 65 years old, the growth of economic is slow and it will fall if young adults is not enough to hold the input of labor supply. Therefore, keeping high proportion of young adults is critical to decide the power of a country.
Likewise, holding the number of younger is effective to strengthen the welfare for residents. As soon as the basis of employees is large by the young adults, government is possible to receive uncountable wealth from various taxes as well as return more feasible measurement for the citizens. For example, when there is a rich warehouse from the government, it is more frequently to afford some funding for inhabitants, such as money aiding for poverty household. Hence, as far as employees’ amount is enough, promoting a well policy for local liver is easily with no doubt about the lack of money.
In conclusion, since the large proportion of young adults can strengthen the economic as well as produce more taxes for the country, it can be obviously seen that the advantages outweigh its advantages.
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008 11
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008 11
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, likewise, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96268656716 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77774386752 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533582089552 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2398764314 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.833333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1666666667 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178805413155 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718271479077 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514391936687 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126375068928 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574713243878 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.