The chart below compares the different numbers of per household in Europe in 1995 and 2005.
The pie charts depict information pertaining to the change about the proportions of different numbers of family members per household in Europe between 1995 and 2005.
Overall, the percentage of families with three people had dramatic increase and occupied the highest in 2005, whereas the percentage of families containing one member dropped significantly and became the lowest.
In terms of the rate of the families with two people, it was the largest in 1995 with 31％ and hovered around the same percentage in 2005. In 1995, only 20％ of families had three people, but its percentage notably climbed to 35％ in 2005, which was the largest.
Turning to the details of the remain kinds of household, the percentage of families containing more than three people occupied 32％ in 1995 and did not change significantly during the given period. However, the proportion of family with one person was 17％ in 1995 and then dramatically plunge to 2％ in 2005, which became the lowest.
- The chart below compares the different numbers of per household in Europe in 1995 and 2005 77
- Some people hold that old people should be taken care at home, while others think they should be placed in old people’s house. What is your opinion? 73
- The diagram shows the stages of processing cocoa beans 61
- Many young people find their first days at college difficult. What are the difficulties they face on their first days? What can colleges do to make them feel more comfortable? 67
- It is not necessary for people to travel and learn about the culture of the other. We can learn the other culture from books, films and Internet. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 27, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e largest. Turning to the details of the remain kinds of household, the percentage of f...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63435644262 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524691358025 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.1009691789 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.5 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226863411402 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133838943757 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137880105978 0.0843802449381 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171477520265 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.157626824833 0.0819641961636 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.