The chart below give information about the high speed continuous internet connection of households in five countries in 2001 and 2002

Essay topics:

The chart below give information about the high- speed continuous internet connection of households in five countries in 2001 and 2002.

The table and bar charts provide a great information about how households in 5 countries had connected with the high-speed continuous Internet in a couple of years.

Overall, it is obvious that Britain country saw the most significant change in the number of families who accessed the high-speed Internet. In addition, the percentage of Korean and American households who made use of this kind of Internet grown considerable, compared to other countries.

Looking in the chart for more details, in 2001, the figure of families accessed the high-speed Internet in America was lower than in Korea, being 9.3% and 12.2% in turn. However, next year, whereas the number of American households with high-speed connection soared 170% and accounted 25.11% of the population, this proportion in South Korea was 20% and covered 13.44% citizens having access to the high-speed Internet.

In terms of the rest of countries, the Internet running with high-speed was believed to be unfavorable, just roughly 0.35% in 2001. Despite of those rapidly growth in 2002, just under 11% of residents in each country took this way of using the Internet into consideration. In particular, the ratio change in Germany and Switzerland was 80% and 120% respectively. Meanwhile, the greatest proportion of households connecting the high-speed Internet belonged to Britain country.

Votes
Average: 9.1 (10 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-09-23 rajpatel90 69 view
2021-08-22 maiphuong0610 74 view
2021-06-07 kory 78 view
2021-03-07 Narges.s 84 view
2020-02-24 Nguyen Manh Dung 92 view
Essays by user nlnvdn1998 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the chart for more details, in 2001, the figure of families accessed the high...
^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed to be unfavorable, just roughly 0.35% in 2001. Despite of those rapidly growth...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, whereas, while, in addition, in particular, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1149.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39436619718 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95320465057 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591549295775 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3025551573 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.666666667 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403667994113 0.215688989381 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166550359569 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113118781968 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263447873132 0.15604864568 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0996214800891 0.0819641961636 122% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.