The chart below gives information about the high-speed continuous Internet connection of households in five countries in 2001 and 2002.
The table and the column chart illustrate the differences and changes in the percentage change of households accessing the high-speed Internet provided by five different countries in 2001 and 2002. Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there were upward trends in all countries, especially the most remarkable change could be found in Britain.
In particular, when it comes to Britain, the graph witnessed a dramatic increase of 230% from 3.3 to 10.9 per 1000 people in the number of households connecting to the Internet. Concerning the USA, the percentage of families in 2001 outnumbered that in 2002 by 5 to 2, particularly at 9.3% and 25.11% respectively, which accounted for the highest number in 2002.
Similarly, regarding Switzerland, a significant rise of 120% from 3.6 to 7.9 per 1000 people was experienced in the number of users. In terms of Germany and South Korea, the period underwent a growth of 80% and 20% from 3.4 and 122 per 1000 people for the former to 5.6 and 134.4 per 1000 people for the latter in the percentages of households accessing high-speed Internet, which constantly constituted the least changes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-23 | rajpatel90 | 69 | view |
| 2021-08-22 | maiphuong0610 | 74 | view |
| 2021-06-07 | kory | 78 | view |
| 2021-03-07 | Narges.s | 84 | view |
| 2020-02-24 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 92 | view |
- The charts below give information about the price of tickets on one airline between Sydney and Melbourne Australia over a two week period in 2013 73
- Some people argue that holding sporting events is beneficial to countries development However other people hold the opposite opinion Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- The map shows the change of Bell Hill from a farm in 1976 to an Environmental Study Centre in 2006 84
- The chart below shows changes in water levels of reservoirs in 6 cities in Australia between 2009 and 2010 10
- Some people believe that educational qualifications always bring success while others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, similarly, so, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03157894737 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93436983282 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584210526316 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.3929819576 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.333333333 112.824112599 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6666666667 22.9334400587 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.23603664747 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210364269403 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102314405948 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108744393127 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141724732569 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608575220733 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.2329268293 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.