The chart below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 projection for 2050.
The pie charts provides the information about the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and predictions for 2050.
Overall, the given data shows there were more population of youth and adults in both countries. As well as, it is anticipated that there will be more population in future who falls between 15 to 59 years categories.
In 2000, from the entire total population of Yemen, more than 50% were children under 14 years. But, in 2015, it is anticipated that it will decrease to 37%. Similarly, in the initial year, there were only 46.3% who falls between the 15 to 59 years. Moreover, it is forecasted to be increased by about 11% in 2050. Although, the smallest number of percentage were of 60 plus people. However, it will be increased slightly by 2050 reaching up to 5.7%.
Italy had the highest population of 61.6% who were mostly youths and adults in 2000. It will be decreased to 46.2% by 2050. In contrast to Yemen, italy had less percentage of population who wear under 15 years. However, it will again decrease by approximately 4 percent. Ultimately, there were 24.1 percent of population who were above 60 years, whereas, it is predicted that it will be increased by double reaching upto 42.3%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | Bibek bakhati | 73 | view |
- The chart below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 projection for 2050. 73
- writing task 1 bar chart 11
- The diagram shows the process of making recycled paper from old newspaper Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparison where relevant 72
- the chart below show the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 73
- the charts below show the UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e children under 14 years. But, in 2015, it is anticipated that it will decrease...
^^
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in 2015, it is anticipated that it will decrease to 37%. Similarly, in the initi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, moreover, similarly, well, whereas, in contrast, as well as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78672985782 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67124577833 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511848341232 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.8759662794 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.1428571429 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0714285714 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218396863785 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088077584686 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12591933874 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200607026683 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.177482446783 0.0819641961636 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.91 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.