The chart below gives attendance figures for Grandville Stadium from 2017, which are projected through 2030 after a major improvement project.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart depicts the information about the number of people who are presented in the Grandville stadium for the different event type(Theater, sporting events and concerts) from 2017 to 2030 and stadium improvements will happen after 2019.
Overall, it can be observed that along the period of the number of attendance is gradually increasing, due to the improvement in the stadium. Out of three events, sporting events has the highest number of attendance number where theatre has the lowest number.
On the one hand, theatre events are the lowest number of presenter in the stadium when compared to other events. In 2017, the number of attendance for the theatre events was around 10000 but it will be started increasing after the stadium improvements. In 2030, the number will rise for almost 50000 when compared to data of 2020 (around 15000). Whereas, concerts events is far better than theatre when compared to the numbers. In 2017, it had around 25000 people in the stadium and the after the progress initiated in 2020, the number of people will rise to almost 40000, but there is drastically rise can be seen in the year 2030 for almost 120000 of people in the stadium.
On the other hand, sporting events had the maximum number of attendance for the period and in 2017 it had a presenter to the stadium was less than 150000 and in 2020 it passes over 150000 due to ameliorate started in 2019. In the year 2030, the number of people will be in the stadium is almost 170000.
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 56
- Many people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce more materials and goods.To what extent do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal? 73
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. 67
- The charts show the percentage of income spent on food and other goods in 3 European countries from 1998 2008 68
- Some people feel that entertainers such as film stars, pop musicians or sports stars are paid too much money.Do you agree or disagree?Which other types of job should be highly paid? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 306, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'compared' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'compares'.
Suggestion: compares
... number will rise for almost 50000 when compared to data of 2020 around 15000. Whereas, ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 345, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... compared to data of 2020 around 15000. Whereas, concerts events is far better than the...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 482, Rule ID: THE_EXACTLY_THE[1]
Message: Duplicated 'the' in the phrase: 'the after the'. Did you mean 'after the'?
Suggestion: after the
... around 25000 people in the stadium and the after the progress initiated in 2020, the number ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... In the year 2030, the number of people will be in the stadium is almost 170000....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1238.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 259.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77992277992 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44734656823 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.397683397683 0.547539520022 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2735899078 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.8 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162560060281 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800374153096 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592293159014 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126460388774 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575550767349 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.