The chart illustrates the percentage of women having the first child from 1966 to 2006.
Overall, it can be seen that all age brackets experienced an upward trend in the number of women giving birth to their child, except for the people aged under 19, and 19-24. In addition, the 30-34 age group had the highest proportion, whereas the lowest figure shown on the chart was recorded in over 40 age bracket.
Turning to the chart for the detail, in 1966, people aged 19-24 accounted for about 62% of total number of the first-time mother, compared to roughly 34% of those aged under 19. Throughout the next 40 years, these figures dropped significantly, reaching 28% and 12% respectively. In contrast, the 25-to-30-year-olds experienced a slight rise from 35% to 38%, despite a high of 50% in 1986.
In terms of remaining age groups, there were about 12% of women aged 30-34, in comparison with nearly 8% of those aged 34-39. During the following 40 years, the percentage of people falling into the 30-34 and 34-39 age brackets peaked to end the period, at approximately 45% and 30% respectively. Notably, about 3% of women aged over 40 gave birth at the first time. By 2006, this figure climbed to about 5%, despite a slight decrease in 1986.
- The diagram below describes how stormwater is recycled in an Australian city 11
- Some people believe that technology causes more problems for modern society than it solves Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The table below shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2000 to 2004 78
- Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motor bike To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'bracket' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'brackets'.
Suggestion: brackets
...n the chart was recorded in over 40 age bracket. Turning to the chart for the detail...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...% to 38%, despite a high of 50% in 1986. In terms of remaining age groups, there ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, whereas, except for, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1037.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80092592593 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68999808135 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587962962963 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 3.36585365854 386% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5278273051 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.222222222 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29951139287 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141616230808 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094857625054 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205538146438 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609715982433 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.