The chart below gives information about the age of women in Australia when they gave birth to their first child in 1966, 1986 and 2006.
The bar chart compares the percentage of women having their first baby at different ages in three years: 1966, 1986 and 2006.
Overall, it is clear that while the number of women giving birth for the first time when they were under 19 and between 19 and 24 witnessed a significant drop while the opposite was true for the remaining groups. It is also evident that there was a dramatic fluctuation in the proportion of women who were in their late 20s and over 40.
As can be seen from the chart, in 1966, the age between 19 and 24 was the most common one to give birth to the first baby, accounting for over 60%, which was nearly two times and six times respectively as much as the figures for those who were from 25 to 30 and from 30 to 34. Moreover, while the number for the former decreased enormously before hitting the lowest point of about 28%, that for first-time mothers who were in their early 30s experienced a substantial upward trend to the peak of approximately 45%. Meanwhile, the figure for those having their first child in their late 20s peaked at 50% in 1986, which was followed by a slight decline of more than 10% 20 years later.
Looking at the chart in more detail, while there was a considerable drop to over 10% in 2006 in the quantity of women at the youngest group, the inverse was true for those who were between 34 and 40, which climbed gradually before hitting the highest point of 30% at the end of the time surveyed. In the meantime, starting at only 3% in 1966, the figure for the oldest women declined moderately to 2% but then saw a growth of about 5% in 2002.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-07 | baoquyen1906 | 89 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | letrang250191 | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | letrang250191 | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-06 | letrang250191 | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-02 | letrang250191 | 67 | view |
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 89
- Internet users as percentage of population
- The diagram below shows the production of olive oil
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 84
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, moreover, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 298.0 196.424390244 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.36912751678 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3164767626 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 106.607317073 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513422818792 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 376.2 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.1506136154 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.75 112.824112599 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.25 22.9334400587 162% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239158313957 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120645161512 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730474618814 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176141135175 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756617474042 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.66 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.