The line chart compares and contrasts data on the changes in the proportion of cars owned in Britain over a 31-year period, starting from 2005.
A closer look at the diagram highlights the fact that the figures for those categories increased throughout this period, with a notable exception of that of no car ownership.
More specifically, in the first ten years, the percentage of people having two and three cars experienced an upward trend with a difference of 7% and 3% respectively. On the contrary, the others witnessed a decline and their figures hit at 38% for one car ownership and 25% for zero car ownership. A next ten-year period shows a slight increase of 2% for both two and three cars ownership. Whereas, the rate of people not having car remained constant with only 25%. In the last ten years, this figure for one car owner increased gradually and reached its initial point at approximately 45% which more than four times that of three cars category. A smaller difference between two cars and zero car ownership was also witnessed in the above period due to a slight decrease of 3% for no car as well as a rise of 4% for people having two cars.
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn news However others believe that they can learn news more effectively through other media Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
- The bar chart below shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman. 73
- The chart shows the number of students in a UK university who completed on time or late failed to write and rewrote their dissertation in 1990 2000 2010 87
- Task 2 Some employers find that their new employees lack in basic interpersonal skills such as lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team What are the causes of this problem Suggest solutions 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 391, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... for both two and three cars ownership. Whereas, the rate of people not having car rema...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, so, well, whereas, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67475728155 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6496184435 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553398058252 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.963850853 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.375 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 5.23603664747 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166514174473 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850866468291 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401862724833 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118084886389 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378183409211 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.