The bar chart illustrates data on the changes in the consumption rate of alternative energy in several nations over a 14-year period, starting from 1997.
Overall, it is clear that the renewable energy consumed by Iceland was by far the highest figure among the other three. Additionally, Sweden and Iceland experienced a gradual increase in the amount of renewable energy, while the opposite is true for Australia and Turkey throughout the observed period.
More specifically, Iceland had the largest amount of alternative energy in 1997, with a figure of roughly 45%, rising gradually to its peak at 70% in 2010. Meanwhile, renewable energy supplied in Turkey accounted for approximately 40% in 1997 and 2000. However, its figure had been dropped to around one-third by the final research year.
On the other hand, Australia and Sweden had the lowest percentage of renewable energy, with only under 9% and 5% respectively in 1997. Australian consumption rate, however, witnessed a slight decrease of about 4% compared to an increase to below a tenth of that of Sweden in the next 14 years.
- The diagram below shows the changes in the number of people who rely on fuel from organic sources form 2004 to 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparision where relevant 74
- Some people think that a huge a mount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion 80
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 78
- As countries have developed there has been a trend towards smaller family sizes Why does this happen How does this affect society 82
- The charts show the percentage of boys and girls aged 5 14 taking part in cultural activities and sports in Australia in 2003 74
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16201117318 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84785817467 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603351955307 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3066985644 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.5 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24315420749 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104453111827 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879056464148 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13931806939 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653777118769 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.