The chart below gives information about global sales of games software, CDs and DVD or video.
The bar chart compares the amount of money from games software, DVD or video and CDs sold worldwide from 2000 to 2003.
In general, as can be seen from the chart, there was an upward trend in the number of game software and DVDs while the figure for CDs saw a slight fall over the period shown. Moreover, the sales of DVDs witnessed a significant rise.
In 2000, the number of CDs products came first with 34 billion dollars, followed by the figure for DVDs with 18 billion dollars. The sales of CDs went down moderately over the next two years, 33 billion dollars in 2001 and 32 billion dollars in 2002. In 2003, the number rose slightly back to 33 billion dollars.
Additionally, the sales of DVDs increased constantly over the period, which rose from 18 to 31 billion dollars between 2000 and 2003. The number of worldwide games software went up only by 6 billion dollars over the next three years, from 12 billion dollars to 18 billion dollars, then remained unchanged in 2003.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-28 | cupinsiuway | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-28 | manjiinder_singh | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | hannahng | 61 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | hannahng | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | hannahng | 61 | view |
- Ndjsj 89
- The chart below gives information about global sales of games software CDs and DVD or video 78
- The diagrams below give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop Discuss both view and give your own opinion 89
- The chart below shows the percentage of people of different age groups who went to the cinema once a month or more in one European country from 2000 to 2011 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, then, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63068181818 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29786523954 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528409090909 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.937267138 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.875 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149785313101 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748032365249 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623338549649 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117270741852 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06541931074 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.