The chart below gives information about the growth of urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given chart compares some aspects of the world in terms of urban population growth and predicts the future.
Overall, it can be seen that Africa's population growth percentages in 1950 and 2000 was the lowest among the countries of Asia. Moreover, Latin America and the Caribbean, the population growth rate is expected to reach the highest point in 2030.
To begin with, in 1950 the percentage of the growing population in Africa and Asia was just above 10%. In contrast, the proportion in Latin America / Caribbean reached over 40% and is still higher than the proportion of people residing in Africa and Asia in 2000. Compared to the whole world, the proportion in 1950 was above Africa and Asia at nearly 30%. And the percentage of the whole world was lower with Latin America / Caribbean.
30 years later, Africa and Asia are expected to have an upward trend but still lower than the world. It is projected that Latin American/Caribbe will reach 80% in comparison to the global average.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-21 | nguyenanhquan | 11 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | nguyenanhquan | 11 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | TLan168 | view | |
| 2023-07-30 | TLan168 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country in different days 78
- The table below shows the salaries of secondary high school teachers in 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile cell phones in a European country from January to September 2002 measured in euro 78
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam 84
- Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community Are disadvantages of this requirement greater than the benefits for the community and individuals 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, so, still, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89411764706 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56167831343 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535294117647 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.3794438307 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.4444444444 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103068833641 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532059628827 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579380203028 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0906634700933 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712497718438 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, so, still, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89411764706 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56167831343 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535294117647 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.3794438307 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.4444444444 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103068833641 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532059628827 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579380203028 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0906634700933 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712497718438 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.