The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile (cell phones) in a European country from January to September 2002, measured in euro.
The graph demonstrates the average cell phone contract cost provided by 4 distinct mobile providers in a country in Europe in 2002.
Overall, the prices of all 4 providers tend to go up. Alpha had the fastest price increase while Sim TX had the lowest.
Domo provided the most expensive service of all 4. There has been a significant increase in its price from 15 euros to around 25 euros in 9 months. Followed by in the scale of price tag was Lex with a price just over 10 euros and slowly increased by 5 euros more during the period. Alpha was an interesting example. It cost fluctuated at a decent price, 5 euros in the first 6 months. Then it increased significantly and reached 25 euros per month in September. In contrast, Sim TX slightly rose in the first 6 months and reached its peak at nearly 15 euros monthly, before it entirely plummeted down to about only 8 euros in the three last months.
- Plan A below shows the ground floor of a particular art gallery in 2005 Plan B shows the same area in the present day 73
- The graph below shows the hours of teaching per year done by each teacher in four different countries in 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table below shows the number of motor vehicles per 1 000 inhabitants in eight countries in 1990 and 2000
- Task 1 The table below gives information about values of the exports of Kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 Unit NZ
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road cause some problems What are the problems What are the solutions 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 743.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.47590361446 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57025680837 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60843373494 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.052080973 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.3 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172806506246 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666458997489 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814282194912 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132548140921 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116009003401 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.41 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.