The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile (cell phones) in a European country from January to September 2002, measured in euro.
The graph demonstrates the average cell phone contract cost provided by 4 distinct mobile providers in a country in Europe in 2002.
Overall, the prices of all 4 providers tend to go up. Alpha had the fastest price increase while Sim TX had the lowest.
Domo provided the most expensive service of all 4. There has been a significant increase in its price from 15 euros to around 25 euros in 9 months. Followed by in the scale of price tag was Lex with a price just over 10 euros and slowly increased by 5 euros more during the period. Alpha was an interesting example. It cost fluctuated at a decent price, 5 euros in the first 6 months. Then it increased significantly and reached 25 euros per month in September. In contrast, Sim TX slightly rose in the first 6 months and reached its peak at nearly 15 euros monthly, before it entirely plummeted down to about only 8 euros in the three last months.
- The sports center that you regularly visit has a problem with some of its equipment Write a letter to the center manager In your letter tell them about the problem describe how it has affected you explain why it should be fixed soon 84
- It has been suggested that all young adults should be required to undertake a period of unpaid work helping people in the community Would the drawbacks be greater than benefits to the community and the young adults themselves 73
- The pie charts below show the data regarding the time people spend on smartphones and tablets divided by category 73
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the government rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 743.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.47590361446 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57025680837 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60843373494 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.052080973 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.3 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172806506246 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666458997489 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814282194912 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132548140921 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116009003401 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.41 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.