The chart below gives information about how commuters traveled to work in one city in New Zealand.
The given bar chart illustrates the ways that commuters used to travel to work in a city in New Zealand from 1996 to 2006.
It is obvious that private vehicles are the most common means of transport for traveling to work during the period given. Also, there were upward trends that could be seen in the figure for company vehicles, public buses, and bicycles.
In 1996, people going to work by private car or truck accounted for half of the employed workers, which was about five times higher than the data for company vehicle and home-workers. It dropped by just over 10 percent by the year 2006, remained the highest percentage. Following the same trend, there are slight declines in the proportion of employees working at home, walking or jogging, going by train, motorcycle or other forms of transport with mere amounts under one in ten.
In contrast, workers traveling to work using company vehicles increased significantly from nearly 10 percent to about 15 percent. As it presented, the upward trend could also be witnessed in the figure for the public bus with over 10 percent and bicycle with approximately 10 percent in the year 2006.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-04 | conmeoconcao | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-01 | conmeoconcao | 88 | view |
- The chart below provides information about student accommodation at one US university in 2013 63
- The chart below gives information about how commuters traveled to work in one city in New Zealand 88
- The chart below gives information about the purpose of visits to five cities in the UK in 2013 59
- The chart below give information about how commuters travelled to work in one city in New Zealand 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89795918367 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51536304112 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612244897959 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1240015847 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182297007164 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851654481959 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110507313895 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13839920645 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126309874366 0.0819641961636 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.