The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words.IELTS

Essay topics:

The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Write at least 150 words.

IELTS Writing Task 1

The given bar chart depicts the figures of social networking sites used by Canadians during 2014 and 2015. The information is given from no site to five sites used in Canada. The data is calibrated in percentage.

First of all, there were one-fourth of people who did not advent any site in both years. Also, there were 36% and 28% of individuals who started using one site in 2014 and 2015, respectively. Probing ahead, roughly a quarter of humans were using two sites, simultaneously.

Furthermore, there were very less figures of people who had been observed to advent three sites. Besides that, there was 4% rise in figures for three sites from the year 2014 to 2015. Similarly, for the four sites and the five sites, there were almost negligible Canadians had noticed.

Overall, the one site was famous among most of the people in both years. whereas, the five sites were insignificantly eminent. Moreover, the number of Canadians using the two sites remained the same during the survey.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-23 Shivam7090 84 view
2019-11-24 Sagar Gurung 78 view
2019-11-20 phanduydat 67 view
2019-11-06 cindycornelia98 67 view
2019-11-06 cindycornelia98 67 view
Essays by user Sharma12345 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...m no site to five sites used in Canada. The data is calibrated in percentage. ...
^^^
Line 9, column 30, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun figures is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...sly. Furthermore, there were very less figures of people who had been observed...
^^^^
Line 13, column 74, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...among most of the people in both years. whereas, the five sites were insignificantly em...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 74, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...among most of the people in both years. whereas, the five sites were insignificantly em...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, furthermore, if, moreover, similarly, so, whereas, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96449704142 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57041856005 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544378698225 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.0852350414 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 69.9166666667 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0833333333 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 5.23603664747 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193577153523 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787296818912 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665333631167 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132588385191 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734971684159 0.0819641961636 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.