The chart below gives information about the purpose of visits to five cities in the UK in 2003.
A glance at a figure for provided information regarding the purpose of visits to five different cities of the UK from January to December 2013.
Overall, it can be seen clearly that the purpose of holiday higher in Edinburgh, while the majority of people visited to all the cities in order to celebrate holiday except, Manchester.In contrast, the minority of individuals went to the all cities for other purposes apart from Liverpool throughout the whole time frame.
The proportion of people who visited to London for their business higher(20%) compared to Edinburgh(10%), meanwhile Birmingham had more people who visited in order to make a business(50%). The rates of people who visited to London and Birmingham are the same at about 8%, whereas Edinburgh had the lowest point compared to other cities in UK.
Purpose of visits which visiting friends or relatives who went to Manchester and Liverpool are the same throughout the period. However, people who visited to Liverpool(30%) for celebrating their holiday was higher than Manchester(20%).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-04 | aligarxi90 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-04 | aligarxi90 | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-04 | aligarxi90 | 78 | view |
- grswgv
- The chart below gives information about the purpose of visits to five cities in the UK in 2003 67
- Some people believe that the best way to travel within a city is by car Others believe it is best to travel by bicycle To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles 78
- The spread of multinational companies and the resulting increase of globalization produce positive effects on everyone Do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...to celebrate holiday except, Manchester.In contrast, the minority of individuals w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, whereas, while, apart from, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26946107784 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89587673208 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544910179641 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.9947181134 43.030603864 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.666666667 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8333333333 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 5.23603664747 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248742877697 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137560841268 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789710215149 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166261797214 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692739494437 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.