The chart illustrates changes in Southland’s main exports in 2000, 2020 and the future projections for 2025. Overall, during the period from 2000 to 2020, both international tourism and dairy products export experienced an upward trend while the amount of exported meat products shown a downward trend. It is forecasted that in 2025, only the international tourism export will keep on following this up trend while dairy products and meats products export will both decrease.
In 2000, Southland’s international tourism export was the largest number with more than 7.5 billions worth. Between 2000 and 2020, this figure rose slightly to reach the 8.75 billions mark while during this period, Southland’s dairy products export skyrocketed to overtake international tourism export place in 2020 with around 10 billions worth. In contrast, meat products export of this country promptly reduce from 2000 to 2020.
Due to the future projections for 2025, Southland’s international tourism export will keep on rising to reach the 10 billions mark and reclaim the first position. In contrast to this, it’s forecasted that in 2025, both dairy products and meat products exports will slowly decline.
- The diagram below shows a possible future means of home energy production Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagram below gives information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram illustrates how bees produce honey Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 65
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47849462366 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79204165248 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494623655914 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0113188458 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.375 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170836440974 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115531749549 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108836869968 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136265393158 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336146900746 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.