The line chart illustrates the Consumption of 3 types of fast food which by Australian Teenagers from 1975 to 2000. Overall, Pizza and Hamburgers consumption shown an significantly upward trend while the consumption rate of fish and chip experienced a downward trend.
In 1975, the most popular fast food among Australian teenagers was fish and chips which was eaten about 100 time per year. However, apart from a slightly up trend from 1980 to 1985, the consumption of fish any chip was gradually decline between 1985 to 2000, when this type of fast food is only eaten 40 time per year by teenagers.
In sharp contrast to this, both consumption rate of hamburger and pizza in 1975 are much lower than fish and chips, which were fewer than 10 times a year. From 1975 to 1985, the consumption rate of hamburgers skyrocketed and from 1985 to 1990, it overtook fish and chips place to become the most famous fast food with teenagers in Australia. After that, this number rose gradually to the place where fish and chips began with more than 100 time eaten per year. Similar to hamburgers, the consumption of pizza followed a long uptrend between 1975 to 1995. After this period, it’s consumption rate remain unchanged from 1995 to 2000.
- The diagram illustrates how bees produce honey Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 65
- The diagram below shows a possible future means of home energy production Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevantWrite at least 150 wo 67
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... Pizza and Hamburgers consumption shown an significantly upward trend while the co...
^^
Line 2, column 229, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'declined'.
Suggestion: declined
...sumption of fish any chip was gradually decline between 1985 to 2000, when this type of...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82159624413 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53881677195 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511737089202 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0095667572 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.111111111 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170506922921 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962067276294 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992729238568 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140995597989 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295972601893 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.