The chart below gives information about the UK's ageing population in 1985 and makes predictions for 2035. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The chart below gives information about the UK's ageing population in 1985 and makes predictions for 2035. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart provides information about how the UK’s population at aged up to 65 changed in 1985 and will be changed in 2035.

Overall, the most elder people lived in Wales while the least was in Northern Ireland. The percentage of population aged 65 and over had a constant increased in 1985 but expert said that the trend will be raised remarkably 2035.

In 1985, nearly 16% of elder people lived in Wales. Both UK and England had equally percentage of population which was 15%. However, Northern Ireland had the lowest population just about 12%.

In 2035, expert said that the percentage of elder population tend to be increased significantly. Growth in the people aged 65 and over will live at Wales, where the figures rose from 16% to 26%. Scotland will be second highest population at 25%. Another point to be considered is that Northern Ireland, UK and England will be equally increased at 22% in the percentage of elder population.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-02-21 namihellokitty 73 view
Essays by user namihellokitty :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'elder' (without 'most') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: elder
...ill be changed in 2035. Overall, the most elder people lived in Wales while the least w...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 791.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88271604938 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63438537093 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506172839506 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8738497898 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.1 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153180737346 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687955048365 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628576758696 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120388114945 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694534640244 0.0819641961636 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.