The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range of the years 1990 and 2010.
The given bar chart shows the various rate of donations provided by British people concerning five different age groups between 1990 and 2010.
Overall, it can be seen that the age group between 36 and 65 tend to give the higher amount of donations compared to other age brackets, while the youngest ages from 18 to 25 donated the least in both years.
The most significant feature is that in 1990, the aged 30 to 50-year-old British gave the highest rate of donations with approximately 42% in 1990. However, in a decade, its figure declined considerably to just over a third. Meanwhile, 51 to 65years old British people spent money on donations at 35%, and they allocated much more money for it in 2010 at about 37%, which was the second largest among all age groups. On the contrary, donations from age between 18 to 25 comprised of only about 18% in 1990 and its figure drop substantially, roughly by a half.
In the meantime, donation trends from aged 60 and above and age group between 26 and 35 are quite similar. At the beginning of the period, both age groups gave donations at around more or less 30%. However, the former group donated a bit more in a decade, reaching over a third. On the other hand, the latter paid much less money for donation compared with the 1990's figure at almost a quarter.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-03 | marykim7178 | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countires. 84
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to have a satisfying career than those who frequently change jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the results of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.Summ 84
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement? 78
- Some people use the internet to search for solutions to their medical problems. Is it a Positive or negative development?Give your own opinion and examples from your own experience. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, third, while, more or less, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6085106383 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47194855356 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557446808511 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4763463589 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.3 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206999483659 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825524645075 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687404439694 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142206879192 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597246051905 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.