The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
The presented bar graph demonstrates the levels of donation contribution of Briton in varieties aged groups in two separated years 1990 and 2010.
Overall, it clearly shows that the majority of British’s citizen made the highest charity contribution during age 36 to 65 and more, in contrast, from age 18 to 35 were the least significant part of the donation.
First and foremost, the most striking feature is that the contributing benefaction was gradually increased step by step through every different age group and reached the apex of 36-50 aged groups which occupied more the 40%. In addition, it continues slightly decreased for the over 65 age group accounted for roughly 33%.
Turning to 2010, it revealed that the dramatic growth in the percentage of British people uses their money for funding charity budget. For the 18-25 and 26-35 groups, this two rate reached peaks of 17% and 24% respectively and especially hit the highest proportion nearly 40% of 51-65 age group. Moreover, it slightly went down exactly 35% for people older than 65.
In comparison, it can be seen that people in the 36-50 group they contributed more money for funding in 1990, otherwise, aging British’s inhabitants around 51-65 concern more about benefaction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | CharanpreetSingh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | exdiscipulus | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | manaswi.ielts | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | azizkhon | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | Zuna-ira | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000. 78
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarise information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- The advantages and disadvantages of online shopping 84
- Children today are not as fit and healthy as in the past. Discuss the causes for this situation with relevant examples and give your opinion on possible solutions. 89
- Development in technology has brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your own opini 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in two separated years 1990 and 2010. Overall, it clearly shows that the major...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ast significant part of the donation. First and foremost, the most striking fe...
^^
Line 4, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or funding charity budget. For the 18-25 and 26-35 groups, this two rate reached ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... exactly 35% for people older than 65. In comparison, it can be seen that peopl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1862745098 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81988463012 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637254901961 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1870134708 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.25 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240278719336 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117231767419 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688472267606 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136022454418 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418441989713 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.