The chart below gives information on the percentages of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.

The chart illustrates the information about the charity work done by British people percentage-wise by various age groups in the years 1990 and 2010.

Overall at the beginning of the period, most of the charity work was done by middle-aged people and at the end of the period, the majority of the charity was from old people and a young-adult group of people was involved least in charity in both years.

The middle-aged people of ages from 36 to 50, almost 40% did the majority of the charity work in 1990 while this number fell by about 6% in the year 2010. And almost 30% of the people of ages from 26 to 35 did charity work in 1990 as compared to 2010 only 24% of people did charitable work. In the year 1990, people aged between 51 to 65 took their greater share in charity estimated at about 35% while this number rose after 20 years by about 4.5%. The number of people ages greater than 65 took part in charity work was 32% in 1990, this figures increase slightly by 3% in the year 2010.

In contrast, the age group did less charity work of all groups include people ages 18 to 25, which was approximately 15% in 1990 which decreased significantly by about 9% in 2010.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 591, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...crease slightly by 3% in the year 2010. In contrast, the age group did less char...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41095890411 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40644034854 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.438356164384 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.3204545327 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.0 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2857142857 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321551047684 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202745516854 0.103423049105 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856295202782 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235654632496 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107745802146 0.0819641961636 131% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.85 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.89 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.