The given is a chart, depicting data on the contribution of British people who gave money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
Overall, it is lucid that though the percentage of British citizens who donated money to charity soared markedly in 2010, most of the donators were from the elderly category.
In 1990, 42% British between the age of 36 and 50 donated to charity and this ratio was the highest. In contrast, only around 17% youth from the 18-25 age-group contributed to the philanthropy works which was the lowest. After two decades, both these percentages declined significantly, 35% and 7% respectively.
While donation participation by the people up to 50 years old decreased in 2010, it sored among the people over 50 years old. In 2010, welfare donation by 51-56 age-group was 38%, a raise than 1990 and it was 35% by the 65+ age group, also an increase.
- The chart below shows the number of men and women (in thousand) in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. 84
- The bar chart below shows the number of employees from the European Union in the United States 1999 58
- The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. It also predicts figures for 2025. 73
- The line graph shows estimated sales of gold in Dubai for 12 months in 2002 in millions of Dirhams. 73
- The chart below gives information on the percentages of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...up was 38%, a raise than 1990 and it was 35% by the 65+ age group, also an increa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 734.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73548387097 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67696070693 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.5774135055 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.857142857 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332847816673 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153499602572 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134129255443 0.0843802449381 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225925040929 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1371626572 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.