The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the year 1990 and 2010.
The bar graph indicates the ratio of British citizens' donations to charity based on their age in two separate years - 1990 and 2010.
In general, British donated money to charity in 1990 is more than they did in 2010. Elderly people who are over 50 years old donated fewer than younger British in 1990. However, they did the opposite in 2010.
In 1990, the number of British in range of the age 36 and 50 donated to charity is the highest ratio, 42%. On the other hand, the ratio of young people from the 18-25 age group contributed only around 17% which is lowest. In 2010, both this percentages dropped considerably, corresponding 35% and 7%.
Although the donation participation by people between the age of 36 and 50 decreased in 2010, it was still in the top 3 highest donations.The donation by 51-56 age-group in 2010 increased from 35% to 38%, and an increase to 35% by the 65+ age group.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-13 | phamngocduyen | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | kulwa | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-15 | KhangEriol | 61 | view |
| 2018-10-11 | Kapil Kumar | 89 | view |
| 2018-09-10 | RaghuVJoshi | 67 | view |
- The diagram illustrates the various stages of life of honey bees. 67
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 36
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the year 1990 and 2010. 84
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The diagram illustrates the various stages of life of honey bees. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...did the opposite in 2010. In 1990, the number of British in range of the ag...
^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ound 17% which is lowest. In 2010, both this percentages dropped considerably, corre...
^^^^
Line 11, column 139, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...as still in the top 3 highest donations.The donation by 51-56 age-group in 2010 inc...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, still, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 749.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65217391304 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55612953535 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 207.9 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4117924738 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.625 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29592514828 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140857923537 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638633545192 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191081955843 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434452808463 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.